Publication
- Title: A Randomized Trial of Intravenous Amino Acids for Kidney Protection
- Acronym: PROTECTION
- Year: 2024
- Journal published in: The New England Journal of Medicine
- Citation: Landoni G, Monaco F, Ti LK, et al. A randomized trial of intravenous amino acids for kidney protection. N Engl J Med. 2024;391:687-698.
Context & Rationale
-
BackgroundCardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is common and associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and subsequent chronic kidney disease; beyond supportive measures, proven preventive pharmacotherapy has been lacking.
-
Research Question/HypothesisDoes perioperative continuous intravenous infusion of a balanced amino acid mixture (intended to recruit renal functional reserve and increase renal perfusion) reduce postoperative AKI compared with placebo in adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass?
-
Why This MattersIf a simple, low-complexity infusion can reduce AKI after cardiac surgery, the intervention is readily implementable at scale and may mitigate downstream kidney-related morbidity in a very large surgical population.
Design & Methods
- Research Question: In adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, does perioperative IV amino acid infusion reduce AKI (KDIGO creatinine criteria, stage ≥1 within 7 days) versus placebo?
- Study Type: Investigator-initiated, multinational, multicentre (22 centres, 3 countries), randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial; perioperative operating room + ICU setting.
- Population:
- Adults (≥18 years) scheduled for elective cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass; expected ICU stay ≥1 night; baseline creatinine available preoperatively.
- Key exclusions included planned/current kidney-replacement therapy, and advanced chronic kidney disease (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2).
- Intervention:
- Blinded continuous infusion of balanced amino acid mixture (Isopuramin 10%) at 2 g/kg ideal body weight/day (maximum 100 g/day), started at operating-room admission.
- Continued until 72 hours after initiation, ICU discharge, initiation of kidney-replacement therapy, or death (whichever occurred first).
- If enteral/parenteral nutrition started within 72 hours, infusion rate adjusted to target total amino acid intake of 2 g/kg/day.
- Comparison:
- Blinded continuous infusion of placebo (Ringer’s solution) at the same rate and using the same stopping rules and adjustment approach.
- Blinding: Double-blind: patients, clinicians, investigators, data collectors, and outcome assessors blinded; statisticians and authors blinded during analysis; pharmacists/trial nurses aware but not involved in data collection/analysis.
- Statistics: Power calculation: planned n=3500 (1750/group) to detect a 20% relative risk reduction in AKI (assumed 25% in placebo) with 90% power at two-sided α=0.05, accounting for three interim analyses using O’Brien–Fleming boundaries; primary analyses by intention-to-treat (with prespecified missing-data imputations; plus per-protocol and as-treated analyses).
- Follow-Up Period: Primary outcome assessed within 7 days after surgery; follow-up for mortality at ICU/hospital discharge and at 30, 90, and 180 days; quality of life at 180 days.
Key Results
This trial was not stopped early. Prespecified interim analyses were performed after enrolment of 25%, 50%, and 75% of the planned sample.
| Outcome | Amino acid group | Placebo group | Effect | p value / 95% CI | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-hospital AKI (KDIGO creatinine criteria), within 7 days | 474/1759 (26.9%) | 555/1752 (31.7%) | RR 0.85 | 95% CI 0.77 to 0.94; P=0.002 | Primary outcome; 2 missing in amino acid group. |
| Stage 3 AKI | 29/1759 (1.6%) | 52/1752 (3.0%) | RR 0.56 | 95% CI 0.35 to 0.87; P not reported | Lower severe AKI; stage 1 predominated overall (430 vs 492). |
| Kidney-replacement therapy during hospital stay | 24/1759 (1.4%) | 33/1752 (1.9%) | RR 0.73 | 95% CI 0.43 to 1.22; P not reported | Event rates low; no clear between-group difference. |
| Duration of kidney-replacement therapy (hours) | Median 64 (IQR 17–100) | Median 64 (IQR 21–81) | Mean diff 9.79 hours | 95% CI −62.13 to 81.70; P not reported | Reported as absolute mean difference. |
| ICU length of stay (hours) | Median 30 (IQR 21–66) | Median 34 (IQR 21–68) | Mean diff 1.39 hours | 95% CI −4.78 to 7.57; P not reported | Reported as absolute mean difference. |
| Hospital length of stay (nights) | Median 7 (IQR 5–9) | Median 7 (IQR 6–9) | Mean diff 0.28 nights | 95% CI −0.36 to 0.92; P not reported | Reported as absolute mean difference. |
| 30-day mortality | 50/1759 (2.8%) | 49/1752 (2.8%) | RR 1.02 | 95% CI 0.69 to 1.50; P not reported | No mortality signal despite AKI reduction. |
| Any adverse drug reactions | 0 | 0 | — | Not applicable | No ADRs reported in either group. |
| Surgical revision for bleeding | 70/1759 (4.0%) | 62/1752 (3.5%) | RR 1.13 | 95% CI 0.81 to 1.58; P=0.48 | Prespecified safety outcome. |
| Sepsis | 75/1759 (4.3%) | 76/1752 (4.3%) | RR 0.98 | 95% CI 0.72 to 1.34; P=0.91 | Prespecified safety outcome. |
- AKI occurred in 26.9% with amino acids vs 31.7% with placebo (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.77 to 0.94; P=0.002).
- Severe AKI (stage 3) was lower with amino acids: 1.6% vs 3.0% (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.87).
- Patient-centred secondary outcomes (kidney-replacement therapy, length of stay, mortality) were similar between groups.
Internal Validity
- Randomisation and allocation: Central, web-based randomisation with computer-generated permuted blocks, stratified by site; concealment maintained by central service.
- Blinding: Double-blind across clinicians/patients/outcome assessors; small numbers of unblinding by mistake (2 vs 2) reported.
- Dropout/exclusions: One placebo-group patient withdrew consent before infusion initiation; otherwise near-complete follow-up for in-hospital outcomes.
- Protocol adherence: Major deviations were uncommon: study infusion never started (16 [0.9%] vs 17 [1.0%]); premature and permanent discontinuation of infusion (48 [2.7%] vs 56 [3.2%]).
- Crossover: Rare (3 [0.2%] vs 1 [0.1%]).
- Baseline balance: Groups were closely matched (e.g., median age 66 vs 67 years; female 30.1% vs 30.1%; median preoperative creatinine 0.96 vs 0.94 mg/dL; hemofiltration during CPB 9.9% vs 9.2%).
- Timing and dose: Infusion began at operating-room admission and continued until ICU discharge/72 hours/KRT/death; achieved similar infusion rates (median 40 mL/h in both groups).
- Separation of the variable of interest: Median infused dose 1260 mL (126 g) vs 1272 mL (127 g); median duration 30 hours vs 31 hours; most stopped at ICU discharge (73.0% vs 71.1%).
- Outcome assessment: Primary outcome based on KDIGO creatinine criteria; creatinine measurements prespecified up to 7 days (as feasible), with sensitivity analyses for missing values and urinary criteria reported.
- Statistical rigour: Prespecified interim analyses; primary ITT with prespecified imputation approaches and supportive per-protocol/as-treated analyses showing consistent direction of effect.
Conclusion on Internal Validity: Strong. Allocation concealment and blinding were robust, event ascertainment was objective, deviations/crossover were infrequent, and the intervention exposure was well matched except for amino acid content.
External Validity
- Population representativeness: Adult elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in high-income settings; predominantly White (98%+), with 30% women; centres largely Italian with small numbers in Singapore and Croatia.
- Key exclusions affecting generalisability: Advanced CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and patients already receiving/planned for kidney-replacement therapy; results may not generalise to emergent cardiac surgery or off-pump pathways.
- Applicability: Intervention is pragmatic (standard infusion product, bedside titration rules) and could be implemented where perioperative ICU infusion protocols exist; transferability to lower-resource settings is less certain given case-mix, baseline risk, and care pathways.
Conclusion on External Validity: Findings are highly applicable to elective on-pump cardiac surgery populations in high-income systems, but extrapolation to advanced CKD, emergency surgery, and settings with markedly different perioperative care infrastructure should be cautious.
Strengths & Limitations
- Strengths: Large, multicentre, double-blind randomised design; objective primary outcome; prespecified interim analyses and sensitivity analyses; low crossover; consistent effect across supportive analyses.
- Limitations: AKI defined primarily by creatinine (limited urine-output data capture post catheter removal); no tubular injury biomarkers; management bundle adherence (e.g., avoidance of hypotension/nephrotoxins) not reported; limited ethnic and geographic diversity; advanced CKD excluded.
Interpretation & Why It Matters
-
Clinical meaningPerioperative amino acid infusion reduced creatinine-defined AKI and stage 3 AKI after elective cardiac surgery, without detectable safety trade-offs, but did not change kidney-replacement therapy, length of stay, or mortality in this trial.
-
Mechanistic framingThe pattern is compatible with recruitment of renal functional reserve (higher perfusion/filtration) rather than clearly demonstrated mitigation of tubular injury, given the absence of injury biomarker data.
-
Practice implicationFor centres seeking a pragmatic AKI-reduction strategy in elective on-pump cardiac surgery, amino acid infusion is a plausible option; whether it improves patient-centred outcomes or long-term kidney health remains uncertain.
Controversies & Subsequent Evidence
- Functional AKI vs tubular protection: Absence of kidney injury biomarkers (e.g., NGAL, KIM-1) limits inference on whether the observed reduction in creatinine-defined AKI reflects true tubular protection or predominantly functional changes in filtration. 1
- Baseline creatinine ascertainment and AKI definition: Concerns were raised that using preoperative creatinine values drawn from records (potentially up to 365 days before admission) could affect AKI classification; authors stated baseline creatinine was obtained in the week before surgery in all patients. 2
- Placebo choice and chloride exposure: Criticism that the control fluid could differentially affect renal perfusion via chloride load was countered by authors noting low chloride concentration and low infusion rate, arguing physiological implausibility of chloride-driven effects. 2
- Generalisation to advanced CKD / albuminuria: Exclusion of eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and lack of proteinuria/albuminuria stratification were raised as limitations for broader kidney-risk phenotyping; authors argued concealed randomisation makes major baseline imbalances in such factors unlikely. 2
- Subsequent evidence synthesis: A 2024 perioperative meta-analysis (including cardiac surgery trials) reported reduced AKI with IV amino acids overall and suggested reduced hospital length of stay, supporting a class effect on perioperative AKI risk, while still leaving uncertainty about long-term kidney outcomes and patient-centred endpoints. 3
- Protocol transparency: The trial’s methodological manuscript and prespecified analytical approach were published before completion, supporting interpretability and reducing analytic flexibility concerns. 4
Summary
- In 3511 adults undergoing elective on-pump cardiac surgery, perioperative amino acid infusion reduced AKI (26.9% vs 31.7%; RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.77 to 0.94; P=0.002).
- Stage 3 AKI was also lower (1.6% vs 3.0%; RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.87).
- Kidney-replacement therapy and patient-centred outcomes (length of stay, mortality) were similar between groups.
- Protocol deviations and crossover were uncommon; blinding and allocation concealment were robust.
- Absence of tubular injury biomarkers and exclusion of advanced CKD limit mechanistic inference and generalisation to highest-risk kidney phenotypes.
Further Reading
Other Trials
- 2024Kazawa M, Kabata D, Yoshida H, et al. Amino acids to prevent cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a randomized controlled trial. JA Clin Rep. 2024;10(1):19.
- 2021Zarbock A, Küllmar M, Ostermann M, et al. Prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury by implementing the KDIGO guidelines in high-risk patients identified by biomarkers: the PrevAKI-Multicenter randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2021;133(2):292-302.
- 2019Pu H, Doig GS, Heighes PT, et al. Intravenous amino acid therapy for kidney protection in cardiac surgery patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157:2356-2366.
- 2015Doig GS, Simpson F, Sweetman EA, et al. Intravenous amino acid therapy for kidney function in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(7):1197-1208.
- 2018Zhu R, Allingstrup MJ, Perner A, Doig GS. The effect of IV amino acid supplementation on mortality in ICU patients may be dependent on kidney function: post hoc subgroup analyses of a multicenter randomized trial. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(8):1293-1301.
Systematic Review & Meta Analysis
- 2024Pruna A, Losiggio R, Landoni G, et al. Amino Acid Infusion for Perioperative Functional Renal Protection: A Meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024;38(12):3076-3085.
- 2019See EJ, Jayasinghe K, Glassford N, et al. Long-term risk of adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies using consensus definitions of exposure. Kidney Int. 2019;95(1):160-172.
- 2016Hu J, Chen R, Liu S, Yu X, Zou J, Ding X. Global Incidence and Outcomes of Adult Patients With Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(1):82-89.
- 2024Landoni G, Brambillasca C, Baiardo Redaelli M, et al. Intravenous amino acid therapy for kidney protection in cardiac surgery: a protocol for a multi-centre randomized blinded placebo controlled clinical trial: the PROTECTION trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022;121:106898.
- 2024Husain-Syed F, Emlet DR, Wilhelm J, et al. Effects of preoperative high-oral protein loading on short- and long-term renal outcomes following cardiac surgery: a cohort study. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):204.
Observational Studies
- 2022Husain-Syed F, Emlet DR, Wilhelm J, et al. Effects of preoperative high-oral protein loading on short- and long-term renal outcomes following cardiac surgery: a cohort study. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):204.
- 2018Husain-Syed F, Ferrari F, Sharma A, et al. Preoperative Renal Functional Reserve Predicts Risk of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(4):1094-1101.
- 2021Ngo JP, Noe KM, Zhu MZL, et al. Intraoperative renal hypoxia and risk of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury. J Card Surg. 2021;36(10):3577-3585.
- 2019See EJ, Jayasinghe K, Glassford N, et al. Long-term risk of adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies using consensus definitions of exposure. Kidney Int. 2019;95(1):160-172.
- 2024Zhu R, Allingstrup MJ, Perner A, Doig GS. The effect of IV amino acid supplementation on mortality in ICU patients may be dependent on kidney function: post hoc subgroup analyses of a multicenter randomized trial. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(8):1293-1301.
Guidelines
- 2024Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105(4S):S117-S314.
- 2023Brown JR, Baker RA, Shore-Lesserson L, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists/American Society for Extracorporeal Technology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention of Adult Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury. Anesth Analg. 2023;136(1):176-184.
- 2021Zarbock A, Küllmar M, Ostermann M, et al. Prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury by implementing the KDIGO guidelines in high-risk patients identified by biomarkers: the PrevAKI-Multicenter randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2021;133(2):292-302.
- 2013Kellum JA, Lameire N, for the KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1). Crit Care. 2013;17(1):204.
- 2012Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1-138.
Notes
- The primary outcome was defined using KDIGO creatinine criteria; a sensitivity analysis incorporating urinary criteria produced a similar relative risk estimate (reported by the trialists).
Overall Takeaway
PROTECTION is a large, double-blind perioperative RCT showing that a protocolised amino acid infusion modestly reduces creatinine-defined AKI and halves stage 3 AKI after elective on-pump cardiac surgery, without clear effects on kidney-replacement therapy or mortality. It advances the field by providing high-level evidence for a pragmatic, readily deployable AKI-prevention strategy, while leaving open whether benefits reflect functional changes in filtration versus true tubular protection and whether longer-term kidney outcomes improve.
Overall Summary
- Perioperative IV amino acids reduced AKI (26.9% vs 31.7%) and stage 3 AKI (1.6% vs 3.0%) after elective on-pump cardiac surgery, with no clear differences in kidney-replacement therapy, length of stay, or mortality.
Bibliography
- 1Ostermann M, Shaw AD. Amino Acid Infusion to Protect Kidney Function after Cardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2024;391:759-760.
- 2Mertens PR, Mottale R, Taccone FS, Gaudry S, Heyman SN, Abassi Z, Afsar B, Afsar RE, Lentine KL, Bellomo R, Monaco F, Paternoster G. Intravenous Amino Acids and Kidney Protection. N Engl J Med. 2024;391:1964-1966.
- 3Pruna A, Losiggio R, Landoni G, et al. Amino Acid Infusion for Perioperative Functional Renal Protection: A Meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024;38(12):3076-3085.
- 4Landoni G, Brambillasca C, Baiardo Redaelli M, et al. Intravenous amino acid therapy for kidney protection in cardiac surgery: a protocol for a multi-centre randomized blinded placebo controlled clinical trial: the PROTECTION trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022;121:106898.



